[加评论] 页面有问题?请点击打印板-》打印版                  [推荐此文给朋友]
[博讯主页]->[大陆新闻]
   

30多个国家超过100位领导者就陈光诚案件致胡锦涛的公开信
请看博讯热点:临沂计生维权

(博讯2006年8月30日)
    

曾金燕
     (博讯 boxun.com)

30多个国家超过100位领导者就陈光诚案件签名致国家主席胡锦涛的公开信

100多名来自30多个国家的生物伦理学、宗教、人权、生殖健康等领域的个体工作者和领导者,就山东盲人赤脚律师陈光诚案件,签名致信中华人民共和国主席胡锦涛。

    
    详细内容,请看:http://chenyuanweijing.spaces.live.com/blog/cns!45D826AAD0517797!321.entry
    或点击:http://www.catholicsforchoice.org/news/pr/2006/documents/ChenGuangchengsignonFINAL.pdf
    
    李劲松等北京律师已经再次赴山东,昨日抵达沂南县,未能见到陈光诚也未拿到判决书。目前陈光诚的亲友、律师和支持者未能拿到陈光诚案的判决书,法院拒绝给与陈光诚妻子袁伟静判决书,开庭前1小时法院指定给陈光诚的所谓“辩护律师”也拒绝把判决书给陈光诚的妻子。
    12:34 PM Add a comment Permalink Trackbacks (0) Blog it
    

附英文信件:
    
    Mr. Hu Jintao
    President of the People’s Republic of China
    c/o Ministry of Justice
    1 Huajiadija, Chaoyangqu
    Bejingshi
    People’s Republic of China
    Via Fax: + 86 10 647 298 63
    
    Dear President Hu Jintao,
    
    As individuals and leaders in the fields of religion, bioethics, human rights and reproductive
    health who are deeply committed to ethical and justice-based policies that uphold the principles
    of informed choice and quality of care and that are voluntary and free from coercion, we write to
    express our deep concern about the case of Chen Guangcheng.
    We have followed favorably the many efforts made by your government to institute measures in
    your national population program that reflect your commitment to the UN ICPD Programme of
    Action and advance non-coercive reproductive health services in China. We know that along the
    road to achieving those goals, individual and local violations of your new laws will happen. But
    we were dismayed to learn that from late 2004 to early 2005, three districts and nine counties in
    Linyi city, Shandong province, engaged in a large-scale population planning campaign that both
    violated the Population and Family Planning Law of the People’s Republic of China and
    included coercive and forceful actions such as imprisonment, assault and non-voluntary
    sterilization and abortion.
    More disturbing has been the state’s actions against Chen Guangcheng, who was tried without
    the presence of his lawyers on Friday, 18 August 2006. Mr. Chen was charged with destruction
    of property and disrupting traffic, although he was originally detained after he sought to gain
    lawful redress for those whose rights under Chinese law were violated.
    In January 2005, Mr. Chen, a lawyer and civil rights defender, and his wife Yuan Weijing,
    launched an investigation into an illegal local population planning campaign in Linyi city. Their
    efforts led to the subsequent investigation and confirmation by the National Population and
    Family Planning Commission in July 2005 that Linyi’s population planning campaign included
    serious violations of law. The combined efforts of Mr. Chen, some victims and other concerned
    citizens exposed Linyi’s illegal actions and compelled local authorities to compensate to some of
    the victims.
    We were troubled to learn that beginning in August 2005, Linyi city and Yinan county
    authorities used surveillance, threats, restrictions on personal freedom and other illegal methods
    to suppress Chen Guangcheng and other rights advocates. Among the human rights violations
    suffered by Mr. Chen are:
    * Illegal house arrest and detention, beginning 12 August 2005;
    * A 6-month forced disappearance, prior to his formal detention and charge in June 2006;
    * Denial of outside contacts and visits by lawyers and family during this detention; and
    * Threats, assaults upon and the detention of Mr. Chen’s lawyers.
    The proceedings leading up to his trial which began on 18 August 2006 are legally questionably
    and include violations of the defendant’s rights to freedom from arbitrary detention and torture
    and the right to legal council. For example, on 17 August 2006, the day before the trial began,
    lawyers Zhang Lihui, Li Fangping and legal scholar Xu Zhiyong were detained by Yinan police
    after unidentified men apprehended them, accusing them of “picking pockets” in the streets of
    Yinan County. While Mr. Zhang and Mr. Li were released, Mr. Xu remains in detention.
    Activists in Shandong and Beijing have been called on the phone or visited by state security,
    who warned them of severe consequences if they try to go to Linyi, and a number of them have
    been put under house arrest or surveillance. Additionally, the Beijing lawyer Gao Zhisheng who
    went to Linyi in July to show support to Mr. Chen was arrested on the 15 August in Shandong,
    and all contacts to Mr. Gao and his family members and relatives have been cut off.
    We are deeply concerned that this trial could not possibly respect the principle of fair trial and
    basic human rights unless the court looks into these accusations and make necessary remedies.
    We ask that the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress, the Standing Committee
    of the Shandong People’s Congress, the Supreme People’s Procuratorate, the Shandong People’s
    Procuratorate, the Ministry of Supervision and the Shandong Supervision Bureau promptly form
    a “special issue” investigation committee, in accordance with the provisions of the Chinese
    Constitution and laws, to immediately begin investigative procedures into and launch legal
    supervision of the severe violations of the human rights of Chen Guangcheng.
    We ask that the court refrain from issuing a verdict until these investigations are completed and
    that if any verdict is rendered before such measures have been taken, its implementation be
    suspended until such investigation is completed and any violations of due process and human
    rights are corrected.
    Protracted illegal restrictions on the personal liberty of Chen Guangcheng and other local rights
    defenders constitute a severe violation of China’s Constitution and the international human rights
    standards that the Chinese government has already committed to and must not be tolerated.
    We ask that the central government expeditiously carry out its constitutional obligation of
    respecting and protecting human rights, and that judicial agencies exercise their right to judicial
    independence, as declared by law, to impartially consider the illegal actions of local law
    enforcement agencies' arbitrary detention of Chen Guangcheng, quickly restore the personal
    liberty of Mr. Chen, Yuan Weijing and associates, and in accordance with the law investigate the
    legal responsibility of those who violated people’s rights. We hope this resolution will include
    the release of Chen Guangcheng and associates as the result of proper due process and in
    conformation with international human rights standards.
    
    Respectfully yours,
    
    (organizational affiliations are provided for purposes of identification only)
    
    Members of Interfaith Delegation to China (Sept 2003):
    o Frances Kissling, Catholics for a Free Choice, Washington, DC
    o Ronald M. Green, Dartmouth College, USA
    o Joke van Kampen, Malawi
    o Jim Martin-Schramm, Professor of Religion, Luther College, USA
    o Maureen Shea, The Episcopal Church, USA
    
    Additional Signatories:
    o Mrs. Tigest Alemu, Consortium of Reproductive Health Associations (CORHA),
    Ethiopia
    o Claudia Arroyo, Colectivo Juvenil “Decide” (Youth Group), Bolivia
    o Dr. Charles R. Ausherman, Institute For Development Training (retired), USA
    o Daniel Axelsson, The Swedish association for sexuality education, RFSU, Sweden
    o Henk Baars, the Netherlands
    o Hossam Bahgat, Egyptian Initiative for Personal Rights, Egypt
    o Frans Baneke, the Netherlands
    o Edie Beaujon, USA
    o Niall Behan, Irish Family Planning Association, Ireland
    o Marge Berer, Reproductive Health Matters, UK
    o Yvonne Bogaarts, World Population Foundation, the Netherlands
    o Jane K. Boorstein, Partnership for Sustainable Families & Communities, USA
    o Rev. Dr. Rita Nakashima Brock, Faith Voices for the Common Good, USA
    o Heidi Bruggink, Feminist Caucus of the American Humanist Association, USA
    o Leo Bryant, Marie Stopes International, UK
    o Prof. Claudia V. Camp, Texas Christian University, USA
    o Patricia A. Clark, (formerly) Fellowship of Reconciliation, USA
    o Amy Coen, Population Action International, USA
    o Sharon Danner, Call to Action of Northern Virginia, USA
    o Mufuliat Dasola Fijabi, BAOBAB For Women's Human Rights, Nigeria
    o Nils Daulaire, MD, MPH, Global Health Council, USA
    o Charles N. Davis, Catholics Speak Out, USA
    o Misodi Johanes Diange, Afrika Initiative e.V. Germany, Germany
    o Silvia Diaz, Casa De La Mujer Luisa Gutierrez, Argentina
    o Verónica Diaz, Católicas por el Derecho a Decidir/Chile
    o Irene Donadio, Belgium
    o Farid Esack, Positive Muslims, South Africa
    o Prof. Susan A. Farrell, PhD, Kingsborough Community College, USA
    o Alice Frade, Portuguese Family Planning Assocation (APF), Portugal
    o Lynn Freedman, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, USA
    o Rosemary Ganley, Catholics for a Free Choice/Canada
    o Donna R. Gary, International Council of Jewish Women, USA
    o Jenny Goldie, Australian Reproductive Health Alliance, Australia
    o Ana Gomes, MEP (PSE, Portugal), Portugal
    o Prof. Paul H. Gundani, Catholic Voices – Zimbabwe
    o Elfriede Harth, Catholics for a Free Choice-Europe, Germany
    o Anissa Helie, Mount Holyoke College, USA
    o Harville Hendrix, PhD, Imago Productions, Inc., USA
    o Rea Howarth, Catholics Speak Out/Quixote Center, USA
    o Mary E. Hunt, Women's Alliance for Theology, Ethics and Ritual (WATER), USA
    o Prof. Ada Maria Isasi-Diaz, Drew University, USA
    o June Jacobs, UK
    o Rabbi Steven B. Jacobs, The Rabbi Steven B Jacobs Progressive Faith Foundation, USA
    o Jodi Jacobson, Center for Health and Gender Equity, USA
    o Nancy Keenan, NARAL Pro-Choice America, USA
    o Rabbi Douglas E. Krantz, Congregation B'nai Yisrael, USA
    o Chen Kuide, China Information Center, USA
    o Teresa Lanza M., Católicas por el Derecho a Decidir/Bolivia, Bolivia
    o Akinwale Lawal, Nigeria
    o Tienchi Liao, China Information Center, USA
    o Katarina Lindahl, RFSU Sweden
    o Janneth Lozano, Regina Soares & Teresa Lanza, Latin American Network of Catholics
    for the Right to Decide, Argentina
    o Carola La Rosa de Luque, APROPO, Peru
    o Elizabeth S. Maguire, Ipas, USA
    o John P. Maguire, Australia
    o Joanna Manning, Canada
    o Anna Marsiana, Asian Women Resource Centre (AWRC), Indonesia
    o Sandra Mazo, Católicas por el Derecho a Decidir/Colombia
    o Katherine McDonald, Action Canada for Population and Development, Canada
    o Dr. Dorothea McEwan, The Warburg Institute, University of London, UK
    o Bridget Mary Meehan, USA
    o Maria Consuelo Mejia, Católicas por el Derecho a Decidir, A.C. México
    o Kirsten Moore, Reproductive Health Technologies Project, USA
    o Eileen Moran, PSC-CUNY, local 2334, USA
    o Judy Norsigian, Our Bodies Ourselves, USA
    o Nancy Northup, Center for Reproductive Rights, USA
    o Frederick Nunes, Advocates for Safe Parenthood: Improving Reproductive Equity
    (ASPIRE), USA
    o Maria José Rosado Nunes, Catolicas pelo Direito de Decidir/Brasil
    o Jeanie Ollivierre, Network of HIV/AIDS, Women in Support of Equity, Educational and
    Economic Empowerment and Marion House, St. Vincent & the Grenadines
    o Brigid O’Reilly, Catholics for a Free Choice/Canada
    o Ayo Obe, Civil Liberties Organisation, Nigeria
    o Gladys Parentelli, Foro Permanente por la Igualdad de Género, Venezuela
    o Rev. Dr. Rebecca Parker, Starr King School for the Ministry, USA
    o Daniel Pellegrom, Pathfinder International, USA
    o Rev. Dr. Albert M. Pennybacker, Clergy and Laity Network of Kentucky and (formerly)
    The Interfaith Alliance, USA
    o Gordon W. Perkin, MD, Path Leadership Council, USA
    o Prof. Rosalind Petchesky, Hunter College & the Graduate Center, City University of New
    York, USA
    o Eva Pils, USA
    o Anika Rahman, Americans for UNFPA, USA
    o Rev. Dr. George F. Regas, The Regas Institute, USA
    o Chini Rueda Sabater, Spain
    o Ulla Sandbæk, former MEP, Denmark
    o Save Our Sacrament: Reform of Annulment and Respondent Support
    o Stirling Scruggs, USA
    o John Seager, Population Connection, USA
    o Jacqueline Sharpe, IPPF - Family Planning Association of Trinidad and Tobago
    o Jill W. Sheffield, Family Care International, USA
    o Steve Sinding, UK
    o Lene Sjørup, PhD, Denmark
    o William H. Slavick, Pax Christi Maine, USA
    o Phyllis Snyder, National Council of Jewish Women, USA
    o Regina Soares Jurkewicz, Rede Latino-Americana De Católicas Pelo Direito De Decidir
    São Paulo – Brasil
    o Rev. Charles H. Straut, Jr., D.Min., Mission and Social Justice Ministry, USA
    o Valerie J Stroud, We Are Church, UK
    o Lend Sund, Belgium
    o Margaret Thomas, Davenport Unitarian Church, USA
    o Emilie M. Townes, Yale University Divinity School, USA
    o Coca Trillini, Católicas por el Derecho a Decidir/Buenos Aires-Argentina
    o Kim S. Wayne, A Critical Mass: Women Celebrating Eucharist, USA
    o Patricia Willis, Feminist Caucus of the American Humanist Association, USA
    o June Keener Wink, USA
    o Sara Winkowski, Uruguay
    o Dr. Mark Wise, Center for Cooperative Change, USA
    o Harry Wu, The Laogai Research Foundation, Washington, DC
    o Susan Wysocki, RNC, NP, FAANP, National Association of Nurse Practitioners in
    Women's Health, USA
    o Mr. Sylvestre K. Zounou, Human Rights Officer, Fondation Afrique Liberte (NGO),
    Togo
    
    CC:
    Standing Committee of the National People's Congress and Standing Committee of the Shandong People's Congress
    People's Republic of China Supreme People's Procuratorate and Shandong Province People's Procuratorate
    People's Republic of China Ministry of Supervision and Shandong Province Supervision Bureau
    Xiao Yang, President of the Supreme People's Court
    Minister Zhou Yongkang, Ministry of Public Security
    Minister Zhang Fusen, Ministry of Justice
    Yang Aihua, Director of the Municipal Population and Family Planning Committee, President of the Municipal Population Planning Association
    Li Qun, Party Secretary of Linyi city, Chairman of Linyi Local People's Congress
    Lian Chengmin, Mayor of Linyi city
    Li Honghai, Member of Linyi Municipal Party Committee Standing Committee, Secretary of the Politics and Law
    Commission
    Liu Jie, Deputy Mayor of Linyi city, Director of Linyi Public Security Bureau
    Ambassdor Zhou Wenzhong, Ambassador of the People’s Republic of China to the United States
    ----------------
    
    www.catholicsforchoice.org
    
    
    CHINA'S PRESIDENT CALLED ON TO RELEASE BAREFOOT LAWYER WHO OPPOSED COERCIVE ABORTIONS
    
    Advocates around the world criticize treatment of Chen Guangcheng, seek investigation and redress for human rights violations.
    
    BEIJING—Today more than 100 leaders in the fields of human rights, bioethics, reproductive health and religion from more than 30 countries and six continents submitted a letter to Chinese President Hu Jintao to protest the treatment and trial of Chen Guangcheng.
    
    The letter, coordinated by Catholics for a Free Choice and signed by individuals who have dedicated their lives to the pursuit of social justice, human rights, ethics and morality, asked the relevant national and municipal authorities “to immediately begin investigative procedures into and launch legal supervision of the severe violations of the human rights of Chen Guangcheng.”
    
    Chen, a lawyer and human rights defender, became subject to harassment, arbitrary detention and other human rights violations last year after exposing a large-scale population planning campaign that both violated the Population and Family Planning Law of the People’s Republic of China and included coercive and forceful actions such as imprisonment, assault and non-voluntary sterilization and abortion in Linyi city, Shandong province. On Thursday, 24 August, he was sentenced to four years, three months imprisonment in a trial that excluded his own lawyers from participation.
    
    “This action against Chen is surprising in light of China’s recent improvements in law and practice, which call for non-coercive reproductive health services,” said Frances Kissling, president of Catholics for a Free Choice and the leader of an interfaith delegation that traveled to China in 2003 to investigate its family planning practices. “It demonstrates governmental ambivalence in implementing these policies. International pressure—especially from those supportive of reproductive health—is essential to building Chinese resolve to respect the human rights of women regarding reproduction.”
    
    Appalled by the treatment of Chen, the signatories of the letter stated: “We hope this resolution will include the release of Chen Guangcheng and associates as the result of proper due process and in conformation with international human rights standards.” (博讯记者:蔡楚) [博讯首发,欢迎转载,请注明出处]- 支持此文作者/记者(博讯 boxun.com)
博讯相关报道(最近20条,更多请利用搜索功能):
  • RFA张敏:营救陈光诚行动(之六)
  • 内蒙古家庭教会被冲击,蒙古族女传教士被判劳动教养,维权人士陈光诚被判坐牢4年3个月 (图)
  • 陈光诚案辩护词/李劲松张立辉李方平滕彪律师许志永博士
  • 昝爱宗:温家宝亲眼目睹山东政府强奸陈光诚
  • 蔡楚:陈光诚被判刑,袁伟静处于非常大的风险中(图)
  • 陈光诚被判坐牢4年3个月\曾金燕(图)
  • RFA张敏:营救陈光诚行动(之五)
  • 让法律、正义和全体中国人蒙羞的审判- 维权网就沂南法院开庭审理陈光诚一案的的声明
  • 声援陈光诚的许志永博士被羁押后回到了北京
  • 陈光诚案仓促审理官方强行委任律师(图)
  • 陈光诚案声援团临沂受阻,杨在新、黄晓敏等人受到询问
  • 曾金燕:陈光诚案今日庭审结束--政府害怕光与诚
  • 陈光诚案快讯:杨在新律师在沂南法院门口被抓
  • 曾金燕:《高三》--陈光诚案8月18日下午2:30开庭
  • 滕彪: 陈光诚案凸显中国法治的困局
  • 关注陈光诚非暴力公民不服从抗争图片(9)(图)
  • 关注陈光诚非暴力公民不服从抗争照片8(图)
  • 关注陈光诚临沂公民不服从抗争图片(7)(图)
  • 关注陈光诚临沂公民不服从抗争图片(6)(图)
  • 林泉:声讨中共乱伦党 <公检法律>联合“扮公”,声援陈光诚
  • 何清涟:从陈光诚、高智晟事件看中国统治手段的非正当化
  • 《共产主义受难者人道援助与救济》今日关注:盲人维权律师陈光诚/贺伟华
  • 赵达功:高智晟、陈光诚等让中共坐卧不宁
  • 郭永丰:为好兄弟陈光诚、高智晟等英雄鼓与呼!
  • 抗议当局的任意拘捕行为,还高律师、陈光诚以自由/贺伟华
  • 孙文广:沂南声援陈光诚记
  • 陈光诚案8月18日下午2点半开庭, 请大家紧急救援/贺伟华
  • 8月12日陈光诚案开庭,我们该如何救之于危难?/贺伟华
  • 沂南县旁听陈光诚案纪实/马文都
  • 冯兰瑞、应松年、姜明安、张思之、茅于轼、吴思:就陈光诚被捕事件致胡锦涛总书记及中共中央常委的信
  • 立此存照:陈光诚在百度里面享受的待遇!(图)
  • 李柏光: 陈光诚与李群之间的"孟良崮战役"
  • 徐沛:闪光的黑眼睛—陈光诚的同道
  • 言信:陈光诚考验中国人的良心
  • 光明之子为何受难,诚实之人为何被囚——为陈光诚案的开庭而写
  • 百度还有什么资格参与自由市场经济竞争——评陈光诚案
  • 张耀杰: 关于陈光诚案与萨达姆案的简单比较
  • 陈光诚一案:生命的抗争-----上网杂感/牧晨


    点击这里对此新闻发表看法
  •    
    联系我们


    All rights reserved
    博讯是畅所欲言的场所、所有文章均不一定代表博讯立场
    声明:博讯由编辑、义务留学生、学者维护,如有版权问题,请联系我们。另外,欢迎其他媒体 转载博讯文章,为尊重作者的辛勤劳动以及所承担风险,尊重博讯广大义务人士的奉献,请转载时注明来源和作者。